Diplomacy between ideology and pragmatism!
Although, it is impossible to easily put world’s states and their diplomacy and political system in the circle of a specific ideology, however their types, nature and ideology in the world of modern era, which is known as the world of relations indicates reaction, political and pragmatic dealings of those countries. In fact, philosophically, human beings remain separate as an unstable one without relations. This is true for political field; those countries that have moved in a wide network of relationships with an active diplomacy and a secular ideology have developed economically and a high level of political power and influences. The prominent example of these countries is China that although is a country with a communist political structure, but in a sense of understanding the reality of the world and need for a relationship remaining and normal persistence of life and the existence of a country of one billion and four hundred million people, it has not closed any relations, even with America, which means pragmatically do politics. China has relations with Iran, with America, with the Arab countries and even with Iraqi Kurdistan.
What is important for Ideological diplomacy is ideology than practical and pragmatic result of its attitude and philosophy that serve country, citizens, stability, and security. The only thing of this type of diplomacy is in service of one idea! One dream!
The dream of establishing an ideal country and a city of dreams! For a religious regime like Iran, this city of dreams is merely destruction of Israel, failure of America, and Muslimization of whole world under Shia regime of Isna Ashari.
From the beginning of uprising till now a diplomatic and media agency of Iran called Kurdistan region as “second Israel”. The reason for this except provides enmity to Israel nothing else because the relationship between Kurds and Israel has continued historical and ethnic relationship than political. Due to a fact that a part of Kurds were the Jews and in the years after establishment of Israel state, they returned to their country. Hence a part of the Kurdish community is related to Israel. Beside this never Israel has directly supported Kurds in the Kurdish history.
Israel has more powers in Tehran, Arak, and Qum than Kurdistan region of Iraq. That’s why this missile attack here by the Islamic Republic is more recognizing the failure of a diplomatic path and looking for opening another direction and way than achieving media goals. Although the Diplomacy of Kurdistan has wisely understood this situation, but we should to know that lobby, committees, and shadows of Islamic Republic in Iraq will allow Iraq being an arena for practice a view that will protect its sovereignty and be a legal and military protection umbrella for the Kurdistan Region?