This analysis is merely personal opinion which demonstrates on examined Islamic movement’s forms in Southern Kurdistan. It attempts to indicate the reasons behind unsuccessfulpersistent forms of working. When I am saying continual forms, this means in particular periods some of these movements may have developed and collected lots of supporters. However, they could not keep with that successful model of working and became stable forms.
Focusing on Islamic movements belong to arguing the movements that wanted to work on the area of managing or models of Islamic movements or at education. This argument does not relate to God worshiping or Kurdish individual’s commitment to religion and worshiping. On the other hand this does not mean talking about Commitment of nation’s worshiping or religion. These are results of Islamic grew and these are not the result of any political movements no one say these movement are belong to them or they are the owner of concepts. My topic starts with last fifties and surges of the first Islamic movements which called Islamic brotherhood. I am not talking about that before this movement, the Kurdish revolutionary on the hands of religious men, both concepts of God worshiping and nations which could became a symbol of revolutionary and Kurdish liberation movements.
Then the Kurdish liberation movement pays more attention to national token and ignores the religious area, thus it can be said that the movement could not advocate the Islamic form such as Khanaqa and famous Mullah did not become the owner of the direction.
The accurate reason why the Islamic movement could not triumph was not advocate the national issues and could not maintain the historical, religion revolutionary and Kurdish that famous Kurdish revolutionary men did as Shikh AbdSalam Barzani, Aubeidullah nahri, Shikh Sied Pirran and Abdula salm led.